man, 24 03 2008 kl. 19:00 +0000, skrev Daniel P. Berrange: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Mads Chr. Olesen wrote: > > Anything further I can do to help get this patch commited? > > > > I have been running with it, without problems across restarts, etc., > for > > a couple of weeks now. > > I still don't see where the routing rules are defined / take place > with this setup. There must be rules somewhere specifying the routing > for the subnet 78.47.YYY.YYY/30, but its not being done in your > patchset AFAICT Do you mean entries in the routing table, or? This is my routing table: $ route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 78.47.YYY.YYY 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 virsubnetbr0 85.10.XXX.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 85.10.XXX.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0 The entry for virsubnetbr0 is setup automatically, by the definition in the XML-file: <ip address="78.47.YYY.YYY" netmask="255.255.255.248" /> -- Mads Chr. Olesen <shiyee@xxxxxxxxx> shiyee.dk -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list