On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 01:19:48AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > Well, you've hit upon a good question here. Is virsh interactive, or > > scriptable? Within Sun we generally attempt to clearly delineate these > > things, precisely for reasons like the above. > > well to me clearly it was designed to be both, clearly it's intended to This is almost always a bad idea IMHO. > Disagreed, adding a field at the end probably won't break most scripts > using sed/awk to extract data, but showing stopped machines will. > But we can add a 'virsh show' command doing a complete listing, then > it's just a matter of rerouting a few synapses, easier done than changing > running code ;-) virsh show doesn't help at all, as it's not any easier to remember than '--all'. The whole problem is that it's non-obvious (and completely different to xm) that the list doesn't include non-running domains. regards, john -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list