On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:07:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:20:24PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > We can't change the semantics of these calls. virNetworkDefineXML() > > explicitly does not affect the current live config, saving the config > > to take effect next time the network is started. This is the same semantics > > as the virDomainDefineXML() call, and the virStoragePoolDefineXML() > > calls. > > Understood. > > > To do live updates, we'd need API similar to the domain device hot attach > > and detach APIs > > Well given that it sounds like the original implementation is just as > good. Any further comments on that? > (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/thread.html#00281) I'm fine with your original proposal, or DV's suggestion to use 3 separate arrays instead of the struct. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list