Re: default hypervisor selection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:51:20PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> I'm mostly with Dan Berrange here.  Surely an environment variable is
> the right thing to do, and then later we can add some advanced probing
> if the environment variable alone doesn't satisfy users.
> 
> The only problem I see is making the NULL case unpredictable or
> introducing unreproducible bugs.  But I guess that's not very likely.

I agree - possible, but not likely too bad - I think we'll easily have a
net win thanks to a more pleasant default end user experiance.

> Dan's patch
> (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-January/msg00234.html)
> is fine except it should include a DEBUG() statement so we have some
> chance to gather information from bug reports about what it was
> actually trying to connect to.  At the moment, the first DEBUG() isn't
> done until after the URI is parsed, and URI parsing is quite likely to
> be a failure point.

Actually in the PolicyKit fix I committed yesterday, I moved the DEBUG
statement into the virConnectOpen() method so we should see the URI
printed before any processing is done.

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]