On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Use safewrite in place of write, in many cases. > And add "make syntax-check" rules to ensure no new uses sneak in. > > There are many uses of write like this: > > if (write (fd, xml, towrite) != towrite) > return -1; > > The problem is that the syscall can succeed, yet write less than > the requested number of bytes, so the caller should retry > rather than simply failing. agreed using safewrite is a good idea, +1 > This patch changes most of them to use util.c's safewrite wrapper, > which encapsulates the process. Also, there were a few cases in > which the retry loop was open-coded, and I replaced those, too. > However, there remain invalid uses of write in both virsh.c and > console.c. I would have replaced those, too, but util.c isn't > linked with them, so it would have made this change more involved. > xend_internal.c has one use, but it's ok, and not easily replaced. maybe for case outside of the library adding a copy of safewrite in virsh.c would be a good way to do this while keeping the code consistent. The duplication of that small function whould not be a real problem IMHO Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list