On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:04:32PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Any objection to a mass removal of trailing blanks? > > [ If you haven't yet been adversely affected by e.g., pointless conflicts > due solely to differences in white space, count yourself lucky, and > chalk it up to not having to deal with many branches. > The sooner we do this the better, IME. ] > > I'm proposing two things: > - remove all trailing blanks > - add a "make syntax-check" check to ensure that no new ones are added > > There aren't that many, but the change would affect many files. > IMHO, such a change should wait until after big patches like > Dan's StorageAPI changes are in. No need to wait for that. My patches don't really touch existing code anymore - I got the general cleanup patches all merged already - all the rest are basically just adding new code. So any merge conflicts should be fairly minimal / easy to resolve Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list