On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:19:16AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Yes & yes. > > The scenario where it was wrong is where you have a big NUMA system where > not all sockets were populated. > > At the same time though, virNodeInfo is a part of the libvirt public ABI > and thus we have to put something in that field. So I'm choosing to continue > to the put information which matches the previous semantics, so we're no > worse off than we always were. Fair enough, but could it at least be documented somewhere visible (I suppose the header file would be OK) ?? thanks, john -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list