On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:10:43PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: [...] > >fine once the shared lib issue is fixed. I assume virsh remote support > >works > >now, right ? > > Yes, see the screenshot in the first post in this thread. dohh, missed it (for my defense my mail setup makes hard to show attached images :-) > >>+ * Copyright (c) 2001, 02 Motoyuki Kasahara > >>+ * > >>+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > >>+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > >>+ * are met: > >>+ * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > >>+ * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > >>+ * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > >>+ * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > >>+ * documentation and/or other materials provided with the > >>distribution. > > > > Ouch, that's not really something we can embbed generally ... > > I'm going to look at an alternate implementation (in gnulib), but what > is the problem with this license? Well it asks for the copyright and those 3 conditions to be listed in all documentation (I think it's one of the BSD advertizing clause variants) and i really don't want to inflict this to people who build tools on top of libvirt. daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list