On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 09:08 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I can understand the need to make it easy for an user, I still don't > think this means those tuning informations need to be associated to the > domain definition, to me it is somehow orthogonal to the domain themselves > and I would rather try to provide a good solution to the problem, than > try to imitate how Xen was doing that. Surely, users who set tuning parameters view them as part of their domain description. To me, having to keep track of yet another file to have the complete description of a domain isn't very appealing. There's plenty of people that only use one hypervisor, and for them, that something only works on Xen or kvm is irrelevant. David -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list