On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:45:44AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > * Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-10-11 08:01]: > > - for the mapping at the XML level I suggest to use a simple extension > > to the <vcpu>n</vcpu> and extend it to > > <vcpu cpuset='2,3'>n</vcpu> > > with a limited syntax which is just the comma separated list of > > allowed CPU numbers (if the code actually detects such a cpuset is > > in effect i.e. in general this won't be added). > > I think we should support the same cpuset notation that Xen supports, > which means including ranges (1-4) and negation (^1). These two > features make describing large ranges much more compact. on input I guess it makes sense. But we can't garantee to have such a compact representation on output. Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list