Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:55:14PM -0400, beth kon wrote:
I was able to test on a 128-way NUMA box and found a bug. My code did
not handle the case of no cpus being associated with a node. I decided
to represent (pretty straightforward decision :-) no cpus as follows in
the xml...
<cell id='2'>
<cpus num='0'>
</cpus>
</cell>
Here is the patch...
Signed-off-by: Beth Kon <eak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Beth,
the patch makes sense but I think a small improvement is in order:
diff -urpN libvirt.orig/src/xend_internal.c libvirt/src/xend_internal.c
--- libvirt.orig/src/xend_internal.c 2007-10-03 19:27:25.000000000 -0700
+++ libvirt/src/xend_internal.c 2007-10-04 05:41:13.000000000 -0700
@@ -1989,6 +1989,15 @@ sexpr_to_xend_topology_xml(virConnectPtr
/* get list of cpus associated w/ single cell */
while (1) {
if ((len = getNumber(offset, &cpuNum)) < 0) {
+ if (!strncmp (offset, "no cpus", 7)){
+ *(cpuIdsPtr++) = -1;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ virXendError(conn, VIR_ERR_XEN_CALL, "topology string syntax error");
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+ if ((len = getNumber(offset, &cpuNum)) < 0) {
Seems to me that at this point the test should read
if (len < 0) {
as getNumber has no side effect and offset or cpuNum are not changed.
Actually I would just move the
len = getNumber(offset, &cpuNum)
as a separate statement out at the beginning of the block of the while loop
for clarity of the code,
Daniel
Yes, that makes perfect sense. Thanks.
--
Elizabeth Kon (Beth)
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: eak@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list