On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 06:10:40AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:12:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Latest XenD allows for default bootloader to be used if one is not defined > > for a paravirt OS. libvirt doesn't currently cope with this (see Solaris > > thread), since it requires either a bootloader or kernel to always be > > present. > > > > The attached patch allows for an emptry bootloader element to indicate that > > the domain should use the default. > > > > <domain type='xen' id='-1'> > > <name>rhel5pv</name> > > <uuid>614d7eb0-c6b1-5235-ac39-361b20f6cd49</uuid> > > <bootloader/> > > <os> > > <type>linux</type> > > </os> > > ...snip... > > </domain> > > > > > > The current API for looking up nodes in the SEXPR did not allow for the > > scenario where you might want to lookup a node with no content, eg > > > > (bootloader ) > > > > This distinction is needed here, so I added an sexpr_has() method to check > > for this. > > > > Second, it fixes a long standing bug where we'd record an error about the > > missing kernel or bootloader, but then continue generating (malformed) XML > > anyway. With this patch, it will correctly fail if the empty bootloader > > field is missing from the SEXPR. > > Looks fine to me +1, Ok, comitted this to CVS. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list