Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:29:07PM -0400, beth kon wrote:
[PATCH 1/2] - add capability to access free memory information on each
NUMA cell.
Signed-off-by: Beth Kon (eak@xxxxxxxxxx)
--
Elizabeth Kon (Beth)
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: eak@xxxxxxxxxx
diff -urpN libvirt.danielpatch/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in libvirt.cellsMemory/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
--- libvirt.danielpatch/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in 2007-09-11 15:29:43.000000000 -0400
+++ libvirt.cellsMemory/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in 2007-09-20 14:11:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -586,8 +586,9 @@ int virDomainDetachDevice(virDomainPtr d
*/
int virNodeGetCellsFreeMemory(virConnectPtr conn,
- unsigned long *freeMems,
- int nbCells);
+ long long *freeMems,
+ int startCell,
+ int maxCells);
Hum, I just realize something, shouldn't we use
unsigned long long *freeMems
instead. I don't see what semantic a negative value can carry, but
maybe I missed something !
Daniel
Yes, I agree. I'll change that.
--
Elizabeth Kon (Beth)
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: eak@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list