On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:31:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:26:04AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > The complexity comes if you think you need to return an array of integer. > > I guess if you just consider passing an unsigned long in and back, filled > > It should be a fixed-size type, surely, and even then I doubt 64 bits is > enough in the mid to long term. Since it's not public and just an RPC layer, if you need to check for more you can add a new separate call. I would not worry for this. Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list