Re: Proposal: Block device and network stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:41:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >It is probably worthwhile though to
> >ensure that we design the APIs so that the structs are always allocated by
> >the internal driver and not the caller. This allows us to add more fields
> >at a later date if needed.
> 
> Instead of the above, the caller has to pass in the size of the struct.
> 
> Pros to passing in the struct & size:
> 
> * New caller / old libvirt can be detected, rather than causing a segfault.
> * Caller is less likely to forget to free the struct (because it is 
> mostly likely on their stack, or they explicitly malloc'd it).

Yep, that works for me.  

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]