Re: [PATCH 1/2] virDomainMigrate implementation (Xen only, no remote, no qemu, no virsh)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



DB> I don't.  The API should be hypervisor agnostic. Needing to pass
DB> HV specific attributes to make it works shows we have failed.

In that case, haven't we already failed with virDomainCreate() since
it takes hypervisor-specific XML?  Doesn't the presence of
VIR_DEVICE_RW_FORCE imply knowledge of Xen-specific behavior?

How would you handle someone wanting to use tcp:// or ssh:// with
qemu?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp9KYYc3tuII.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]