Hi Would you give me a comment on this patch? Thanks, Masayuki Sunou. In message <200705291541.BEI87583.29KNGE37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> " [PATCH] Device attach/detach on virsh (command optionversion)" "Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" wrote: > Hi > > This patch adds virsh attach-device/detach-device. > This supports a definition of a device by command option(proposal 1). > > I examine the following opinions, and "attach-interface" supports only two > common case (bridge, virtual network). > > > Networking is more complicated because there are 8 (!) different ways to > > connected up VMs so far. We could either have huge numbers of args, or > > we could just support the two common cases (bridge, virtual network) and > > say for more complex cases use full XML. > > > Any comments are welcome! > > Signed-off-by: Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks, > Masayuki Sunou. > > > In message <200705111842.IJH95853.739E2KNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > "Re: [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh" > "Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I understood as follows. > > > > * There is no problem in a proposal 1 and a proposal 2 > > * It is better that the user can choose use of XML and use of command-option > > by the situation > > > > Therefore, I want to add both proposal 1 and proposal 2 to virsh. > > There is no problem in this opinion? > > > > And, I am going to correct about naming. > > vif --> interface > > vbd --> disk > > -- > Libvir-list mailing list > Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > > >