On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:45:58AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:04:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>Below is the plan for delivering the remote patch for review in stages. > >> More details about in each email. I only expect to get through the > >>first two emails today. > > > >I've been testing this out for real today > > > > - IPv6 works correctly > > - Once I generated the client & server certs the TLS stuff was working > > pretty much without issue. Though we could do with printing out some > > clearer stuff in the scenario where user typos on cert/key path names > > as the current stuff is a littel obscure. > > Yes, I've fixed this in the latest version so it prints out meaningful & > helpful errors. > > > - I've been testing with the QEMU driver and hit a few problems with > > the fact that qemuinternal.c will grab the URIs containing hostnames > > in the virConnectOpen call. So qemu was getting the connection before > > remote driver had a chance. Should be simply to path qemu_internal > > to ignore URIs with a hostname set. > > I don't know why this is necessary, since the remote driver is always > supposed to be called first. But anyway I added: Ahhhhh. That would be my dodgy merging of patches. The patch which registered the remote driver didn't apply to my checkout so I just put in a manual call to registerRemote(), but had it after all the other drivers. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|