Re: PATCH: Fix uninitialized variable & bridge setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Two crazy bugs

ACK to both, but ...

 - I forgot an =0 initialization in a recent patch to deal with qemu startup

@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static int qemudExtractVersionInfo(const
         _exit(-1); /* Just in case */
     } else { /* Parent */
         char help[8192]; /* Ought to be enough to hold QEMU help screen */
-        int got, ret = -1;
+        int got = 0, ret = -1;
         int major, minor, micro;
if (close(newstdout[1]) < 0)

... I'm really surprised that gcc doesn't warn about this one. I'm always compiling with full warnings and -Werror.

Rich.

--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]