On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Jan Michael wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 07.05.2007, at 22:06, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:13:57AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> >>Hi, Jan
> >>
> >>I think you should use 0.2.1 at this moment.
> >>libvirt cannot handle Xen-hypervisor-domctl correctly on 0.2.2.
> >>But Xen-hypervisor-sysctl works fine.
> >>This problem recognized in two weeks ago,
> >> but I have no time to investigate this issue.
> >
> >I've been trying to reproduce / diagnose the problems you reported too
> >but not had much luck so far. Every way I look at it the code looks to
> >be using the correct hypercall numbers, operation numbers & structs.
> >Until I just noticed this:
>
> Thank you for trying to tracking down this error.
> Even though I get the following error from virsh command line interface,
>
> <error>
> [root@xen-machine libvirt-0.2.1]# ./src/virsh
> libvir: error : no support for hypervisor
> lt-virsh: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
> </error>
Can you re-run with
strace -f -o virsh.log ./srv/virsh
And send the resulting log file.
Also, can you run 'lsof -p <pid>' for the PID which matches
xenstored, and the 2nd python XendD process.
# ps -axuwf | grep xen
Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ
root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< May08 0:00 \_ [xenwatch]
root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< May08 0:00 \_ [xenbus]
root 30138 0.0 0.0 69080 712 pts/2 S+ 09:23 0:00 \_ grep xen
root 3106 0.3 0.0 8396 900 ? S May08 10:08 xenstored --pid-file /var/run/xenstore.pid
root 3111 0.0 0.4 172968 9252 ? S May08 0:00 python /usr/sbin/xend start
root 3112 0.5 1.4 359856 29728 ? Sl May08 15:33 \_ python /usr/sbin/xend start
root 3114 0.0 0.0 20520 548 ? Sl May08 0:00 xenconsoled
You'd need to run
lsof -p 3106
lsof -p 3112
..as root.
> >The second thing is that we've just discovered a bug in the Fedora Xen
> >kernels 2.6.20 wrt to SMP which could cause random bad things to
> >happen
> >So if you're using a Fedora 2.6.20 kernel it is also worth seeing
> >if it
> >is still a problem with an older Fedora 2.6.19/18 kernel, or with the
> >vanilla upstream Xen
>
> I'm not really shure about my kernel version and its origin because I
> didn't compiled it myself. But it is very likely that my kernel is no
> Fedora one because I use Scientific Linux.
At very least output from 'xm info' will usefull
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|