Re: PATCH: Use --strict-order with dnsmasq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: PATCH: Use --strict-order with dnsmasq
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 08:54:44 +0100
Cc: libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070501122435.GE27924@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners, 62 Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland. Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873 Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane
References: <20070501122435.GE27924@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 13:24 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> Thus I think we should always use --strict-order when running dnsmasq. The
> attached patch adds this

	Yep, sounds good to me.

Cheers,
Mark.

Prev by Date: Remote patch, 2007-05-01
Next by Date: Re: Re: [PATCH] allocate virBuffer* routines
Previous by thread: Re: PATCH: Use --strict-order with dnsmasq
Next by thread: Re: PATCH: Use --strict-order with dnsmasq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Virt Tools] [Libvirt Users] [Lib OS Info] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]