Re: PATCH: Use --strict-order with dnsmasq

["Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> So by default, the algorithm dnsmasq uses for DNS lookups is 
>
>  a) Different from that use by GLibC
>  b) Wrong
>
> Thus I think we should always use --strict-order when running dnsmasq. The
> attached patch adds this

The patch is fine, but I don't understand why you think the dnsmasq 
algorithm is any less right than the glibc/resolver one.

Rich.

--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF     Mobile: +44 7866 314 421

Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature