Hi, Daniel Thank you for you information It would be helpful. Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:36:01PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > > Hi, Dan > > > > Thank you for comment. > > Shigeki does not repond this issue at this moment. > > I will comment on this instead. > > He should respond this issue quickly! > > > > In his survey, > > Many area is allocated as constant data(usually about 1KB size) > > in libvirt. > > He plan to fix this issue(dynamical allocation(which you suggested) > > as next stage (Fedora 8 or later.) > > > > As a Fedora 7 phase solution, > > He choses constant data size for solving this issue. > > I also think 130KB is too big. > > I just want to point out that 0.2.2 is the version released last week > and which should end up in Fedora 7, but further release will be pushed > as updates (as I submitted 0.2.2 for FC6 testing on Monday). > > Daniel > > -- > Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ > Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ > veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/