On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:48:01PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Re-factor things a little for the next patch so that we maintain > the rules in memory even when we're not going to write them to > disk. [...] > if (!(r = (char **)realloc(rules->rules, sizeof(char *) * (rules->nrules+1)))) > return ENOMEM; Seems the rules tab is zeroed, but when you extend it you don't zeroe the new part of the array, but it may not give problem in practice (or a very hard one to track down ;-) Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/