Re: [PATCH] Add a default network

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
And the "Stateless autoconfiguration" diagram seems to be exactly what
I think we'd want. Every guest has a MAC addr so that deals with the
lower 64-bits of the adress, but how do we choose the upper 64-bits to
form our 'router advertisment'...  Perhaps that's the bit that we stick
in the libvirt XML as the configuration parameter

IPv6 has a way that hosts can choose a (semi-)random upper 64 bits as well. Unfortunately as far as I can see it's deprecated :-(

Anyhow, you can read more about it here:

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3513.html (section 2.5.6)
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3879.html

You might also consider using link-local addresses (which are not deprecated), since the guests are supposed to be directly connected to each other. I'm not sure of the implications of that though ...?

Rich.

--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF     Mobile: +44 7866 314 421
 "[Negative numbers] darken the very whole doctrines of the equations
 and make dark of the things which are in their nature excessively
 obvious and simple" (Francis Maseres FRS, mathematician, 1759)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]