On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:04:22PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:40:54PM +0900, ASANO Yuzuru wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want to add the info of VCPU mapping into the XML, > > because we cannot manage VCPU mapping automatically > > when a domain starts or reboots. > > > > But in the following patch, the function written in "TODO" > > which I wanted has not been accepted. > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2006-August/msg00015.html > > > > If I provided the patch managing VCPU mapping in the XML, do you accept it? > > The VCPU mapping, schedular parameters, and similar types of data are all > examples of 'runtime policy' you'd apply to a guest domain. The XML format > meanwhile, is expressing a guest's virtual hardware definition. IMHO we > should not mix runtime policy with hardware defintiion, and thus I'd say > it was not appropriate to include VCPU mapping in the XML. If I good remember we've selected XML, because it supports namespaces and you can extend a domain description by arbitrary three-party (non-libvirt) stuff. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>