On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:27:52AM +0100, Philippe Berthault wrote: > Daniel Veillard a écrit : > > it is 0.1.8 but with 12 patches which are backport of later bug fixes or > >important features like localization, shareable disk support, core dump > >support, > >etc ... > > I guess it's closer to 0.1.9 as a result than 0.1.8, > > > Hum ! :-( > Currently, the version of libvirt determines its unequivocal contents. > With a patched version of libvirt, it becomes impossible in an > application to known the functionalities level of libvirt if the version > number is identical to a non-patched libvirt. > > Could you explain how it's possible from an application to distinguish > between a patched libvirt and a non-patched libvirt or another patched > version of libvirt by using the virGetVersion() function ? Can explain your problem instead ? What is the feature or behaviour you need to detect ? Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/