Re: virDomainDump() API (equivalent to xm dump) in libvirt?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:32:41AM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:53:57AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > 
> >   Okay I can see how this would be useful, the questions I would have would be:
> >     - how generic is this, i.e. suppose a different hypervisor back-end
> >       would this still make sense. I guess yes, for example with an UML
> >       back-end we could check the process status and force a dump with a
> >       signal and move the core to the given file not trivial but same semantic
> >       would be doable.
> 
>  Is there any policy what should be included in the library? I think
>  we will see many virtualization projects and an intersection between
>  all projects could be very small. From my point of view include to
>  the library something less generic is not big problem if we provide
>  API with a "non-implemented" (ENOSYS) return codes.

A good sanity check for a proposal is to ask yourself - how would this
be implemented & data represented for QEMU or  UserModeLinux, or VMWare. 
If you can think of plausible implementations / representations then 
that's a good sign the proposal isn't too Xen specific.

For 'xm dump' / virDomainDump() I think its pretty clear all the major
virtualization technologies have some method of dumping a VM's state
so ths API seems sound to me too.

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]