On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:53:59PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >Now the good news. Since it was sooo broken, we can fix without worrying > >about XML compatability since there is no way any application could be > >relying on it in its current state. > > > > Sorry to have dumped the HVM code in such crude shape. I wanted to > finish the work when returning from vacation in July but became > distracted with other tasks :-(, and then went on another vacation last > week :-). The patch I sent in June only worked for the most basic > configurations. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the state of the > patch when posted. > > BTW, I like the resulting patch from this thread. My apologies again > for not following through on the HVM support. That's ok - the work you did to kickstart the HVM code was very helpful milestone to getting the core HVM support up & running. Thanks for reviewing the latest HVM updates too :-) While I remember - if anyone out there is using Xen on ia64, checking that libvirt works for HVM VTi domains would be helpful - most of my testing is on x86_64 platforms so far. Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|