On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 15:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Thus I propose a top level '<features>' block within the '<domain>' XML doc. > This block would contain tags named after each feature to be enabled. Presence > of the named tag enables the feature, ommision disables it (thus all features > are disabled by default - matching current behaviour). Sounds good to me. As well as useful to have :) > My only thought, is 'features' a good name for this ? Only other name I > came up with was 'capabilities' but this is harder to spell :-) I think feature is actually pretty reasonable Jeremy