Re: Source repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:59:43PM -0700, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> Given that most Xen related stuff (including virt-man) lives in
> Mercurial repositories, it seems a little weird (and a little
> cumbersome) that libvirt continues to use CVS. This issue briefly came
> up on the list once earlier, but didn't go anywhere. Is there any
> strong reason why libvirt can't move to Mercurial?

  I know how to manage secure access to a CVS server, add users, write
access, provide anonymous access and snapshot to tarballs. I have no idea
how to do this with a mercurial server, that's #1 reason. I want the
source code tools to be hosted on a server I manage too.
Why do you think it is weird ? libvirt is not part of Xen source tree.
You should not have to recompile libvirt when you compile Xen (and vice
versa) so where is the problem for you ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]