On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 16:12 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:33:24PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > > > Yeah my first reaction was to provide XML based configuration files > > >that libvir would be able to understand, but I really think the > > >configurations > > >may come from very varied sources possibly databases. That's why I would > > >rather have the library agnostic when it comes to what a configuration > > >may look like. > > > > > > > > I'll have to think about this one. My biggest fear is that if there are > > a bunch of management tools capable of creating domains you'll end up > > with a bunch of different places storing configs. > > I expect my QA engineers and the developpers to store their configs in > different places on the test cluster :-) you really expect people to > use a unified storage ? I didn't expect it myself. There should be (at least) suggested and by distributions supported way how to share domain configurations between more tools. I think we can support both -- unified storage (/etc/something) and API that allows to use customized storages (e.g. databases). Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>