On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:20 PM Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Christian,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:55 PM Christian Ehrhardt
<christian.ehrhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> for some recent releases the new ubuntu version was added after the version
> was released. Which made it odd for users to not find the version they are on.
> This time lets add 20.04 ahead of time.
>
> Since there isn't a released versions yet the links will have to go to the
> daily builds. Those are and will continue to be correct and more up-to-date
> than the release images. But obviously e.g. Volume-size will change.
>
> I have added the expected final URLs in the XML so that you should have an
> easy switch after the release in case you want to switch to the release URLs.
>
> While I was working on that I found some more fixups that could be applied.
>
Cool, I'll review these patches Tomorrow. Meanwhile, I'd like to
mention that the preferred way to submit patches for libosinfo
projects is opening a Merge Request against
https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/.
Would you mind opening the MR there? If you do mind, I'll review the
patches here in the ML.
No problem at all, but that will add another patch to the readme :-)
Because I only submitted it here as-is because it said:
"Patch submissions are welcomed from any interested contributor. Please
use the libosinfo list as the preferred way for patch submissions, ordiscussions about the code:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
"
I'm more than happy to use the gitlab MR workflow on this.
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
