On 3/28/19 12:15 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 3/27/19 7:38 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:24 PM Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> This series has been written considering: >>> - https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2019-February/msg00247.html >>> - a similar patch will be done for medias >> >> Well, Cole's patches just adds "unknown" to the architectures, so no >> similar patch is needed for medias :-) >> I'm wondering here whether "all" could be used for the same purpose as >> there's no such thing as a media or tree of all architectures. >> >> Anyways, Daniel, is "unknown" fine? Would you prefer going for >> "fallback" instead? Or just abuse the meaning of "all"? >> > > Yes I think arch="all" is nicer, it's a better name and we already use > that pattern for resources arch="all" so there is precedent > ccing Dan too who wasn't on the original CC - Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
