On 2/18/19 2:58 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:28 PM Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 12/21/18 9:09 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > --- > > data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > <http://centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in> | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > <http://centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in> > b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > <http://centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in> > > index 8b3531e..cc583b9 100644 > > --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > <http://centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in> > > +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > <http://centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > > See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license > text --> > > <os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0";> > > <short-id>centos7.0</short-id> > > + <short-id>centos7</short-id> > > <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name> > > <version>7.0</version> > > <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor> > > > > Huh I didn't know we could do that, but I see we do the same for debian > distros, so it makes sense > > > Cole, I will end up dropping this patch. > While we can do that (as in our schema allows that), there's no code on > libosinfo that would properly deal with a second short-id. > > So, for now, I'll not go for this patch. Hmm indeed, I made a note for myself to look into this and besides being allowed in the XML, and there being some ubuntu/debian data examples, I can't see any way to access the second short-id via the API. Too bad, would be helpful in some cases for sure - Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
