On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 13:29 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > This test only ensures that libosinfo is able to properly load the > > resource info from an OS entry. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/test-os.c | 53 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> Ouch, I've just noticed that I forgot to add the new xml for this test when I sent the patch. diff --git a/tests/dbdata/os/libosinfo.org/test-os-resources-basic.xml b/tests/dbdata/os/libosinfo.org/test-os-resources-basic.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..65f6fb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/dbdata/os/libosinfo.org/test-os-resources-basic.xml @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> + <os id="http://libosinfo.org/test/os/resources/basic";> + <short-id>resourcesbasic</short-id> + <name>Resources Basic</name> + <vendor>libosinfo.org</vendor> + <family>test</family> + + <resources arch="all"> + <minimum> + <n-cpus>1</n-cpus> + <cpu>1</cpu> + <ram>1</ram> + <storage>1</storage> + </minimum> + <recommended> + <n-cpus>2</n-cpus> + <cpu>2</cpu> + <ram>2</ram> + <storage>2</storage> + </recommended> + <maximum> + <n-cpus>3</n-cpus> + <cpu>3</cpu> + <ram>3</ram> + <storage>3</storage> + </maximum> + <network-install> + <n-cpus>4</n-cpus> + <cpu>4</cpu> + <ram>4</ram> + <storage>4</storage> + </network-install> + </resources> + + </os> +</libosinfo> It's going to be pushed as part of this commit as well. _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
