On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > After a conversation with Fabian Arrotin, from CentOS project, I've > learned that there's no supported upgrade from CentOS 6 to CentOS7. > > Knowing that, let's just drop the "upgrades" field from centos7 entry. The <upgrades> feature was not indicating whether the upgrade path is "supported" or not. It is indicating that this release is considered a newer version than the listed version. This allows applications to order releases, and will apply inheritance of settings. In addition, even if CentOS doesn't consider in-place upgrades supported, they are still possible. So I don't think removing this is right. > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > index 20422f2..c3f45a2 100644 > --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ > <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor> > <family>linux</family> > <distro>centos</distro> > - <upgrades id="http://centos.org/centos/6.5"/> > <clones id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/> > > <release-date>2014-07-07</release-date> > -- > 2.19.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Libosinfo mailing list > Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
