On Friday, 30 November 2018 14:41:13 CET Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > The tree info added is based on what's supported/recommended by > virt-install and can be used there when adding support for > unattended-installations. > > A big thanks to Andrea Bolognani for pointing those out. > > - Changes since v1: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2018-November/msg00313.html > - Removed all the wrongly added "treeinfo" from v1 and only left the > URLs Adding this kind of information to osinfo-db is a good idea, however it should be added in a different way. Using <tree> for the Debian/Ubuntu style of trees will make users of osinfo-db use these URLs as if they were Fedora/CentOS ones, resulting in failures. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
