On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:39 AM Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:43:24PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > From: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > In a similar way of what's done on openSUSE and Fedora, let's have an > > "unknown" entry for RHEL that would cover any possible future releases > > while the proper release is not added to our db. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > data/os/redhat.com/rhel-unknown.xml.in | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-unknown.xml.in > > > > diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-unknown.xml.in b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-unknown.xml.in > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..180c666 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-unknown.xml.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ > > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> > > +<!-- Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later. > > + See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text --> > > + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/unknown";> > > + <short-id>rhel-unknown</short-id> > > + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Unknown</_name> > > + <version>unknown</version> > > + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor> > > + <family>linux</family> > > + <distro>rhel</distro> > > + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/8-unknown"/> > > I guess I would mark it as updating rhel 8.0, not an unreleased version > of RHEL8. Apart from that, this looks good to me, Upgrading 8-unknown gives us one less file to update whenever 8.something gets released, as 8-unknown is going to be updated together. [snip] _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
