On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:43 AM Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/14/18 4:54 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > Please, see the patches > > > > osinfo-db: > > Fabiano Fidêncio (1): > > schema: Add "maximum" resources > > > > data/schema/osinfo.rng.in | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > libosinfo: > > Fabiano Fidêncio (3): > > os: Deal with "maximum" resources > > test-os-resources: Make test_minimum_recommended_resources generic > > test-os-resources: Cover maximum resources in tests > > > > osinfo/libosinfo.syms | 3 + > > osinfo/osinfo_loader.c | 8 ++ > > osinfo/osinfo_os.c | 40 ++++++++++ > > osinfo/osinfo_os.h | 2 + > > tests/test-os-resources.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 5 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > > > The patches look good to me. However, from usability POV I think this is > going to be used for Windows only, right? I've found this: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension#Microsoft_Windows I'd say, yes. This effort is driven mainly focused on Windows. > > For other OSes (Linux and BSD) I don't expect there to be any kind of > maximum resources. Good luck with getting the data. I will :-) Thankfully it was not that hard to find for some distros, like: https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits > > Michal _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
