On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:06:50AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:34 AM Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My rationale for this is that in a few weeks the official ISOs will be released and we'd just remove the prerelease tag and add the release date. > > This is somewhat similar to what I did with Ubuntu 18.10 recently. The > URLs point to the daily iso build which is really the recommended way > to get Ubuntu's development release. Before my change, the pre-release > Ubuntu iso's weren't recognized at all so you don't get any of the > pre-configured RAM and disk sizes in Boxes. It's also a problem if > developers always run the development release and so don't see how the > behavior is different with recognized stable release iso's. > > It's a bit different for Fedora because I believe Fedora does have > generic recognition for these pre-release ISOs in osinfo-db. Yep, for fedora/opensuse, there are 'catch-all' fedora-unknown/opensuse-unknown OSes. > > Anyway, I would support the Fedora proposal here. Yes, thanks for pointing out the ubuntu situation, it would indeed be odd to accept the patches for ubuntu and not the similar ones for fedora. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
