On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:43 PM Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:05:11PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > data/os/centos.org/centos-6.10.xml.in | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 data/os/centos.org/centos-6.10.xml.in > > > > diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.10.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.10.xml.in > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..50e9559 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-6.10.xml.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ > > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> > > +<!-- Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later. > > + See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text --> > > + <os id="http://centos.org/centos/6.10";> > > + <short-id>centos6.10</short-id> > > + <_name>CentOS 6.10</_name> > > + <version>6.10</version> > > + <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor> > > + <family>linux</family> > > + <distro>centos</distro> > > + <upgrades id="http://centos.org/centos/6.9"/> > > + <clones id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.10"/> > > + > > + <release-date>2017-04-05</release-date> > > + <eol-date>2020-11-30</eol-date> > > Since this is not the 'real' eol date, but the eol for the rhel6 series, > not specifically 6.10, maybe it's better not to include this for now? Either this or update the eol-date when/if a 6.11 is released. What would be your preference? > > Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
