On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:57:14PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Christophe Fergeau > >> <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:29:43PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> >> The regex to match unknown openSUSE prereleases is becoming > >> >> bigger and harder to read. > >> >> > >> >> Basically, what it's doing is: > >> >> > >> >> (15\.[1-9]|(1[6-9]|[23]|[5-9])[0-9]\.[0-9]|4[3-9]\.[0-9]) > >> >> --------- ----- ---------------- ---- ------------- > >> >> | | | | | > >> >> v v v | v > >> >> 15.1+ 16 20, 30, 50 - 90 v 43.0+ > >> >> .0, .1, ..., .9 > >> >> > >> >> I'm desconsidering both the 13.x series or older and 42.x series as > >> >> those are not going to have new releases anymore. > >> > > >> > "desconsidering"? Dropping? > >> > >> I'll change it to "Dropping" before pushing. > >> > >> > Note that > >> > https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap does not entirely closes the > >> > door on another 42.x release "There are currently no plans to release an > >> > openSUSE Leap 42.4 aligned with the next service pack of SLE 12", but > >> > that's close enough. > >> > Are they really going to release 43.x in parallel to/after 15.x? > >> > >> No, they have no intention to release 43.x. I've talked to Richard > >> Brown about this during openSUSE conference last weekend and > >> explanation he gave me is that they're moving back to a number that > >> would match SLES. > >> The whole 42.x series was in order to totally distinguish between the > >> old base they had with the new shiny system that Leap was supposed to > >> be. > >> > >> So, they're now following 15.x ... if at some point SLES will have a > >> 16.x opensuse 16.x will come to the playground as well. > > > > Your regexp in the commit log and in your patch has a 43.x part, so this > > can be dropped. > > I see where the confusion came from. > So, if you don't mind I'd prefer to keep it there because the regex is > keep everything: > 15.1+, 16-41, NOT 42, 43-99 Ah ok, you want to match all version numbers which never corresponded to something which was released. Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
