On 05/11/2018 10:01 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Clang 6 doesn't like the way the last item in a GOptionEntry
array is initialized:
../../tools/osinfo-install-script.c:87:12: error: missing field
'short_name' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers]
{ NULL }
^
Does it work without warning with the simpler:
{ 0 }
which is supposed to be the universal 0-initializer?
Does it work with the gcc/clang extension of:
{}
(even though the C standard does not describe that form)?
Does it work if you used a named initializer, as in:
{ .foo = NULL }
Otherwise, the fact that you have to spell out multiple fields feels
like a bug in clang giving pointless warnings.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
