On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All the atomic ISO images have the same systemd-id and volume-id, so the > only way to distinguish them is based on volume size. The 7.1 and 7.2 > media have a volume-size recorded, but the 7.0 media does not. > > Currently we load entities in the order in which the filesystem returns > them from readdir(). If we're unlucky this can mean when matching media, > we'll match a 7.1 or 7.2 ISO against the 7.0 media by mistake. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > data/os/redhat.com/rhel-atomic-7.0.xml.in | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-atomic-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-atomic-7.0.xml.in > index cb9434e..5db6efa 100644 > --- a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-atomic-7.0.xml.in > +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-atomic-7.0.xml.in > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > <iso> > <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > <volume-id>RHEL.*Atomic.*7 x86_64.*</volume-id> > + <volume-size>750313472</volume-size> > </iso> > <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> > <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > -- > 2.14.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Libosinfo mailing list > Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo Patch will be pushed Today and will be part of the next release (done later Today!). -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
