Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:38:41PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > --- > > data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in > > > > diff --git a/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..5697b69 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/data/os/freebsd.org/freebsd-10.4.xml.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ > > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> > > +<!-- Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later. > > + See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text --> > > + <os id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.4";> > > + <short-id>freebsd10.4</short-id> > > + <_name>FreeBSD 10.4</_name> > > + <version>10.4</version> > > + <_vendor>FreeBSD Project</_vendor> > > + <family>freebsd</family> > > + <distro>freebsd</distro> > > + <upgrades id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.3"/> > > + <derives-from id="http://freebsd.org/freebsd/10.3"/> > > There was some conversation on IRC regarding upgrades VS derives-from, I > don't think derives-from is needed here. Could you please clarify when it's appropriate to use derives-from? PS It looks like these are not pushed yet. Do you want me to send v2 with derives-from dropped or you can amend that before pushing? Thanks, > Apart from this, > Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Christophe Roman Bogorodskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
