On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> >> BTW: the test-isodetect test is still failing for me (surprisingly). >> > >> > What is the failure? Could it be caused by an outdated osinfo-db? >> >> Hmm. Fails here as well and I have the latest osinfo-db installed. > > Those errors rather suggest you have old data installed somewhere > that is being found. Perhaps in $HOME or /etc/ - it definitely > isn't finding the new osinfo-db data What I've notice here is libosinfo tries to search for the db in /usr/local/share/ ... while it is installed in /usr/share/... > > > There *is* a single genuine failure in the test, however, that was caused > when the patches to add F25 were added last week, caused by incorrect > volume size data AFAICT > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
