Hi Daniel, Thank for your reply, because I have no experience on writing patch, I have turned David for help, he will help me to prepare or submit patches. Best Regards XieMing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Ming Xie" <mxie@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx, phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx, tzheng@xxxxxxxxxx, juzhou@xxxxxxxxxx, "Xiaodai Wang" <xiaodwan@xxxxxxxxxx>, lhuang@xxxxxxxxxx, "David King" <dking@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:36:16 PM Subject: Re: Improve the size of default memory for rhel6 guest to 2048M On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:25:02AM -0400, Ming Xie wrote: > Hi All, > > I meet a problem that guest can't boot into rhel6 after installation > or rhel6 can't be installed in guest if the guest has only 1GB memory > and has no swap partition, I know this is not bug because rhel6 systems > with low memory(1 GB and less) and less than the recommended amount of > swap space may have issues ranging from low responsivity up to and > including complete inability to boot after the installation > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/sn-Supported_Installation_Hardware-x86.html > I see virt-manager built for rhel7 could adjust memory to 4096M when > create windows guest , but the default memory size always will be set > as 1024M when create linux guest in virt-manager, customers may don't > know rhel6 need to create swap if memory < =1GB, I think the default > memory size 1GB is not appropriate when create rhel6 guest in > virt-manager, besides, virtualbox has a related bug about this > ttps://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/8490 , customer has thought default > memory setting is too low to install rhel6 in guest > Could we improve the size of default memory for rhel6 guest to 2048M > so that customer doesn't need to care about whether need to create a > swap partition if mem < 1G and it will reduce the risk of failure > installation in rhel6 guest Yes, I don't know why we have set the recommended level at 1GB, as it is clearly too low to be useful. We currently have the min ram set at 512 MB: <resources arch="all"> <minimum> <n-cpus>1</n-cpus> <ram>536870912</ram> </minimum> <recommended> <cpu>400000000</cpu> <ram>1073741824</ram> <storage>9663676416</storage> </recommended> </resources> Based on this: https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits 512 MB is only acceptable for i386, x86_64 requires 1 GB min and PPC wants 2 GB. So we clearly need to update the RHEL6 limits both minimum and recommended. Could you submit a patch for the various RHEL XML files to update these limits. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo