On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:49:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The LGPLv2+ is only applicable for code that needs to be linked > with other non-GPL compatible code. The actual osinfo database > files aren't linked in any traditional sense - they're merely > parsed. As such they can be just tagged with the GPLv2+, and > it would still be valid for them to be used for non-GPL compat > application code. > > This also adds an explicit header to all the XML files to make > their license clear. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> No complaints, so I pushed this. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
