Re: [PATCH osinfo-db] Fix COPYING file to refer to GPLv2+, not LGPLv2+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:49:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The LGPLv2+ is only applicable for code that needs to be linked
> with other non-GPL compatible code. The actual osinfo database
> files aren't linked in any traditional sense - they're merely
> parsed. As such they can be just tagged with the GPLv2+, and
> it would still be valid for them to be used for non-GPL compat
> application code.
> 
> This also adds an explicit header to all the XML files to make
> their license clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>

No complaints, so I pushed this.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux