On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:57:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:42:09PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > DATA_DIR is then used to lookup the osinfo database. This means that the > > database and the library have to be built to use the same prefix. I'm > > wondering if it would make sense to have a .pc file together with the > > database to help with locating the system database. Probably not worth > > the complication at this point. > > We have an osinfo-db-paths tool that can report this data, for all > 3 db locations. pkg-config isn't a great fit, since it can't report > the user location as it can't dynamically substitute in env variables Hmm, ok, all I wanted to point out is that this use of DATADIR was assuming we used the same DATADIR when installing the database. But osinfo-db-paths has the same limitation as well. I don't think it's really important unless we get a bug report about this :) Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
